← Home · In-Situ

Field Permeability Testing in Aylesbury – Lefranc & Lugeon In-Situ Methods

Together, we solve the challenges of tomorrow.

DETAILS →

The kit we pull up to site with in Aylesbury usually involves a double-packer assembly, a water meter calibrated down to fractions of a litre per minute, and enough hose to run a constant-head test twenty metres down if the geology demands it. Most of the town sits on a complicated stack of Kimmeridge Clay over Gault, with pockets of river gravel threading through the Thame valley at elevations around 72 metres above ordnance datum. When we run a Lefranc test in a borehole through weathered Gault, the flow rate often tells a different story than the lab remoulded sample ever could — and that discrepancy is exactly why we bring the gear out. For deeper rock sections below the clay cap, the Lugeon method becomes the tool of choice, especially where Portland Stone or the underlying Corallian beds show fracture flow that a simple falling-head test would miss entirely.

A single Lugeon test in fractured chalk under Aylesbury can save more in dewatering redesign than twenty lab permeameter runs on intact core.

Approach and scope

The contrast between a site up near the Berryfields development corridor and something tucked into the older Victorian terraces of Southcourt is stark once you look at the permeability numbers. Berryfields sits on glacial till and flinty chalk drift where a Lugeon test at 3 to 5 bar pressure stages might give you Lugeon values jumping from 2 to 15 across a single two-metre packer interval — classic fracture-dominated flow. And if you compare that with the silty Gault clays under Southcourt, a standpipe test performed at three metres depth often yields hydraulic conductivity below 1 × 10⁻⁸ m/s, which changes the entire dewatering strategy for even a modest basement excavation. Understanding that contrast across just three miles of Aylesbury is what stops a contractor from installing a wellpoint system where it will never draw air. We typically pair field permeability runs with grain-size analysis on recovered split-spoon samples to correlate the in-situ hydraulic conductivity with Hazen-estimated values, catching any bias introduced by silt laminations or secondary cementation before it ends up in a groundwater control plan.
Field Permeability Testing in Aylesbury – Lefranc & Lugeon In-Situ Methods
Technical reference image — Aylesbury

Site-specific factors

The error we see repeated across the Aylesbury Vale is treating the Gault as an impermeable blanket without checking for silt partings or weathered fissures that act as preferential flow paths. A contractor will design a cut slope or a retaining wall assuming hydrostatic pressure will never develop behind it, only to find water weeping through hairline cracks in the clay after the first wet winter — and suddenly the retaining wall is coping with pressures it was never reinforced for. Another classic mistake is running a single falling-head test in a trial pit and extrapolating that number across a 100-metre-long foundation footprint without accounting for the lateral variability of the river terrace deposits along the Bear Brook corridor. BS 5930 is explicit about the need for multiple test horizons, yet we still walk onto sites where the permeability profile is based on one data point. When the formation is chalk with flint bands, skipping the Lugeon pressure-reversal loop can mask hydraulic jacking effects — the kind of thing that turns a routine grouting programme into a claims nightmare.

Need a geotechnical assessment?

Reply within 24h.

Email: contact@geotechnical-engineering1.com

Technical parameters


ParameterTypical value
Test method per BS 5930Constant-head (Lefranc) in soil; Lugeon (packer) in rock
Borehole diameter range (soil)100 mm to 200 mm casing; open test section typically 0.5–1.0 m
Lugeon pressure stages5 stages at 1, 2, 3, 2, 1 bar (BS EN ISO 22282-3 sequence)
Typical K range measured (soil)1 × 10⁻⁵ to 1 × 10⁻⁹ m/s in Aylesbury clay formations
Lugeon value classification<1 (very tight) to >100 (very open) per Houlsby interpretation
Test zone isolationPneumatic or mechanical single/double packer, NX to PQ borehole
Reporting outputK per test interval, Lugeon diagrams, transmissivity estimates, GW control recommendations
Quality standardUKAS-accredited laboratory for supporting soil index testing; field log signed by chartered engineer

Related technical services

01

Lefranc constant-head tests in overburden

Variable-head and constant-head Lefranc testing in boreholes and CPT soundings through the Gault, Kimmeridge Clay, and Quaternary gravels, with flow-rate logging at 30-second intervals.

02

Lugeon packer testing in bedrock

Five-stage pressure tests in chalk, Portland Stone, and Corallian limestone using pneumatic double packers. Lugeon values calculated per the Houlsby method with full pressure-vs-flow curves.

03

Falling-head tests in standpipes and piezometers

In-situ falling-head response tests in newly installed Casagrande and vibrating-wire piezometers, corrected for sand pack and wellbore storage per Hvorslev shape factors.

04

Dewatering and groundwater control assessment

Permeability profiles integrated with groundwater level monitoring to produce inflow estimates, well spacing recommendations, and Environmental Agency-compliant discharge calculations.

Relevant standards


BS 5930:2015+A1:2020 – Code of practice for ground investigations, BS EN ISO 22282-3:2012 – Geotechnical investigation and testing – Geohydraulic testing – Part 3: Water pressure tests in rock, Eurocode 7: EN 1997-2:2007 (Ground investigation and testing), CIRIA Report C750 – Groundwater control: design and practice

Q&A

What kind of budget should I expect for a Lefranc or Lugeon test programme around Aylesbury?

For a site investigation including two to three Lefranc test intervals in soil and a single-borehole Lugeon profile through chalk, budgets typically land between £530 and £810 per borehole day, depending on access constraints and the number of pressure stages logged. Mobilisation and piezometer installation are quoted separately after we review the borehole schedule.

How do you decide between a Lefranc test and a Lugeon test on the same Aylesbury site?

It comes down to the geology. In soil-like materials — the Gault, Kimmeridge Clay, or river terrace deposits — we use the Lefranc method because the test section can be left uncased and the flow remains laminar. As soon as the borehole hits the chalk or the Portland Stone, we switch to a Lugeon setup with packers to isolate fracture zones and run multi-stage pressure tests, which tell us whether flow is fracture-dominated, dilatant, or shows signs of hydraulic jacking.

How long does a field permeability test programme take from setup to final report?

A single borehole with two Lefranc intervals and one Lugeon profile is usually completed in one field day, assuming stable hole conditions. Laboratory index testing on companion samples — Atterberg limits, particle size distribution — runs in parallel and takes three to five working days. The factual report with interpreted hydraulic conductivity values, Lugeon diagrams, and groundwater control notes is typically issued within ten working days of demobilisation.

Location and service area

We serve projects across Aylesbury and its metropolitan area.

View larger map
/body>